↓ Skip to main content

Question order bias revisited: A split‐ballot experiment on satisfaction with public services among experienced and professional users

Overview of attention for article published in Public Administration, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Question order bias revisited: A split‐ballot experiment on satisfaction with public services among experienced and professional users
Published in
Public Administration, August 2020
DOI 10.1111/padm.12688
Authors

Mads Thau, Maria Falk Mikkelsen, Morten Hjortskov, Mogens Jin Pedersen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 27%
Student > Master 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 10%
Engineering 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 19 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,358,056
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Public Administration
#139
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,292
of 405,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Administration
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.