You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108654 |
| Authors |
Sean Hoban, Michael Bruford, Josephine D'Urban Jackson, Margarida Lopes-Fernandes, Myriam Heuertz, Paul A. Hohenlohe, Ivan Paz-Vinas, Per Sjögren-Gulve, Gernot Segelbacher, Cristiano Vernesi, Sally Aitken, Laura D. Bertola, Paulette Bloomer, Martin Breed, Hernando Rodríguez-Correa, W. Chris Funk, Catherine E. Grueber, Margaret E. Hunter, Rodolfo Jaffe, Libby Liggins, Joachim Mergeay, Farideh Moharrek, David O'Brien, Rob Ogden, Clarisse Palma-Silva, Jennifer Pierson, Uma Ramakrishnan, Murielle Simo-Droissart, Naoki Tani, Lisette Waits, Linda Laikre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 152 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 11% |
| United States | 14 | 9% |
| Sweden | 7 | 5% |
| Australia | 6 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Denmark | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 65 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 49% |
| Scientists | 70 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 502 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 502 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 91 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 71 | 14% |
| Unknown | 151 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 164 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 59 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 53 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 8% |
| Unknown | 169 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#321,914
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#212
of 6,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,006
of 428,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#6
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.