| Title |
Numerical Hydrodynamics in General Relativity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Living Reviews in Relativity, August 2003
|
| DOI | 10.12942/lrr-2003-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José A. Font |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 2% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 2% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 101 | 78% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 25 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 78% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,741,757
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#69
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,921
of 49,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.