↓ Skip to main content

Pollen limitation may be a common Allee effect in marine hydrophilous plants: implications for decline and recovery in seagrasses

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Pollen limitation may be a common Allee effect in marine hydrophilous plants: implications for decline and recovery in seagrasses
Published in
Oecologia, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00442-016-3665-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. I. Van Tussenbroek, L. M. Soissons, T. J. Bouma, R. Asmus, I. Auby, F. G. Brun, P. G. Cardoso, N. Desroy, J. Fournier, F. Ganthy, J. M. Garmendia, L. Godet, T. F. Grilo, P. Kadel, B. Ondiviela, G. Peralta, M. Recio, M. Valle, T. Van der Heide, M. M. Van Katwijk

Abstract

Pollen limitation may be an important factor in accelerated decline of sparse or fragmented populations. Little is known whether hydrophilous plants (pollen transport by water) suffer from an Allee effect due to pollen limitation or not. Hydrophilous pollination is a typical trait of marine angiosperms or seagrasses. Although seagrass flowers usually have high pollen production, floral densities are highly variable. We evaluated pollen limitation for intertidal populations of the seagrass Zostera noltei in The Netherlands and found a significant positive relation between flowering spathe density and fruit-set, which was suboptimal at <1200 flowering spathes m(-2) (corresponding to <600 reproductive shoots m(-2)). A fragmented population had ≈35 % lower fruit-set at similar reproductive density than a continuous population. 75 % of all European populations studied over a large latitudinal gradient had flowering spathe densities below that required for optimal fruit-set, particularly in Southern countries. Literature review of the reproductive output of hydrophilous pollinated plants revealed that seed- or fruit-set of marine hydrophilous plants is generally low, as compared to hydrophilous freshwater and wind-pollinated plants. We conclude that pollen limitation as found in Z. noltei may be a common Allee effect for seagrasses, potentially accelerating decline and impairing recovery even after environmental conditions have improved substantially.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Other 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 47%
Environmental Science 16 21%
Unspecified 1 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,854,433
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,171
of 4,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,780
of 340,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#32
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.