| Title |
The Role of Patients’ Explanatory Models and Daily-Lived Experience in Hypertension Self-Management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-012-2141-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara G. Bokhour, Ellen S. Cohn, Dharma E. Cortés, Jeffrey L. Solomon, Gemmae M. Fix, A. Rani Elwy, Nora Mueller, Lois A. Katz, Paul Haidet, Alexander R. Green, Ann M. Borzecki, Nancy R. Kressin |
| Abstract |
Uncontrolled hypertension remains a significant problem for many patients. Few interventions to improve patients' hypertension self-management have had lasting effects. Previous work has focused largely on patients' beliefs as predictors of behavior, but little is understood about beliefs as they are embedded in patients' social contexts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 41 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2012.
All research outputs
#18,756,367
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6,408
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,684
of 165,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#53
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.