Title |
Surgical techniques for sciatica due to herniated disc, a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Spine Journal, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00586-012-2422-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wilco C. H. Jacobs, Mark P. Arts, Maurits W. van Tulder, Sidney M. Rubinstein, Marienke van Middelkoop, Raymond W. Ostelo, Arianne P. Verhagen, Bart W. Koes, Wilco C. Peul |
Abstract |
Disc herniation with sciatica accounts for five percent of low-back disorders but is one of the most common reasons for spine surgery. The goal of this study was to update the Cochrane review on the effect of surgical techniques for sciatica due to disc herniation, which was last updated in 2007. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 17% |
Bulgaria | 1 | 17% |
Norway | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 108 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
Researcher | 12 | 11% |
Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Other | 24 | 22% |
Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 52% |
Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 30 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,184,445
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#191
of 4,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,393
of 163,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#2
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.