↓ Skip to main content

Dead tree branches in urban forests and private gardens are key habitat components for woodpeckers in a city matrix

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape & Urban Planning, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dead tree branches in urban forests and private gardens are key habitat components for woodpeckers in a city matrix
Published in
Landscape & Urban Planning, October 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103869
Authors

Arkadiusz Fröhlich, Michał Ciach

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 27 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 24%
Environmental Science 13 18%
Unspecified 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 32 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,448,566
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#822
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,856
of 432,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#26
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.