↓ Skip to main content

Lipid-lowering drugs

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Lipid-lowering drugs
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00018-005-5406-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Pahan

Abstract

Although a change in life-style is often the method of first choice for lipid lowering, lipid-lowering drugs, in general, help to control elevated levels of different forms of lipids in patients with hyperlipidemia. While one group of drugs, statins, lowers cholesterol, the other group, fibrates, is known to take care of fatty acids and triglycerides. In addition, other drugs, such as ezetimibe, colesevelam, torcetrapib, avasimibe, implitapide, and niacin are also being considered to manage hyperlipidemia. As lipids are very critical for cardiovascular diseases, these drugs reduce fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular abnormalities in the general population. However, a number of recent studies indicate that apart from their lipid-lowering activities, statins and fibrates exhibit multiple functions to modulate intracellular signaling pathways, inhibit inflammation, suppress the production of reactive oxygen species, and modulate T cell activity. Therefore, nowadays, these drugs are being considered as possible therapeutics for several forms of human disorders including cancer, autoimmunity, inflammation, and neurodegeneration. Here I discuss these applications in the light of newly discovered modes of action of these drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 216 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 17%
Student > Master 36 17%
Student > Bachelor 35 16%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 39 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 9%
Chemistry 9 4%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 53 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,156,307
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#92
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,770
of 67,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.