↓ Skip to main content

Continuous renal replacement therapy versus intermittent hemodialysis in intensive care patients: impact on mortality and renal recovery

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Continuous renal replacement therapy versus intermittent hemodialysis in intensive care patients: impact on mortality and renal recovery
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4404-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne-Sophie Truche, Michael Darmon, Sébastien Bailly, Christophe Clec’h, Claire Dupuis, Benoit Misset, Elie Azoulay, Carole Schwebel, Lila Bouadma, Hatem Kallel, Christophe Adrie, Anne-Sylvie Dumenil, Laurent Argaud, Guillaume Marcotte, Samir Jamali, Philippe Zaoui, Virginie Laurent, Dany Goldgran-Toledano, Romain Sonneville, Bertrand Souweine, Jean-Francois Timsit, OUTCOMEREA Study Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Postgraduate 16 12%
Other 14 10%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 34 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,941,184
of 24,933,778 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,957
of 5,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,689
of 346,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,933,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.