| Title |
Patients’ perspectives can be integrated in health technology assessments: an exploratory analysis of CADTH Common Drug Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-016-0036-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Berglas, Lauren Jutai, Gail MacKean, Laura Weeks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 23 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 18% |
| Spain | 8 | 10% |
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 16% |
| Scientists | 13 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 20% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#711,686
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#32
of 512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,726
of 355,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.