↓ Skip to main content

Terminal burrowing behaviour — a phenomenon of lethal hypothermia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, March 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Terminal burrowing behaviour — a phenomenon of lethal hypothermia
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, March 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf01369918
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Carter, M. A. Green, C. M. Milroy, J. C. Clark, V. Schneider, M. A. Rothschild

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,404,945
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#372
of 2,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,460
of 24,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.