You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What could go wrong with cooking? Exploring vulnerability at the water, energy and food Nexus in Kampala through a social practices lens.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102086 |
| Authors |
Patience Mguni, Bas van Vliet, Gert Spaargaren, Doreen Nakirya, Jimmy Osuret, John Bosco Isunju, Tonny Ssekamatte, Richard Mugambe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 80% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 54 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 33 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 10% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 64 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,719,491
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#1,572
of 2,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,101
of 432,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#27
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.