↓ Skip to main content

Weak competitive ability may explain decline of Taxus baccata

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Forest Science , February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Weak competitive ability may explain decline of Taxus baccata
Published in
Annals of Forest Science , February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13595-012-0193-4
Authors

Grzegorz Iszkuło, Yakiv Didukh, Marian J. Giertych, Anna K. Jasińska, Karolina Sobierajska, Janusz Szmyt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 49%
Environmental Science 15 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,983,439
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#913
of 951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,723
of 168,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.