↓ Skip to main content

Height-related changes in forest composition explain increasing tree mortality with height during an extreme drought

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Height-related changes in forest composition explain increasing tree mortality with height during an extreme drought
Published in
Nature Communications, July 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-17213-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan L. Stephenson, Adrian J. Das

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 24 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,917,077
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#35,252
of 52,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,885
of 401,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,107
of 1,513 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,513 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.