| Title |
Native American gene flow into Polynesia predating Easter Island settlement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2487-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander G. Ioannidis, Javier Blanco-Portillo, Karla Sandoval, Erika Hagelberg, Juan Francisco Miquel-Poblete, J. Víctor Moreno-Mayar, Juan Esteban Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Consuelo D. Quinto-Cortés, Kathryn Auckland, Tom Parks, Kathryn Robson, Adrian V. S. Hill, María C. Avila-Arcos, Alexandra Sockell, Julian R. Homburger, Genevieve L. Wojcik, Kathleen C. Barnes, Luisa Herrera, Soledad Berríos, Mónica Acuña, Elena Llop, Celeste Eng, Scott Huntsman, Esteban G. Burchard, Christopher R. Gignoux, Lucía Cifuentes, Ricardo A. Verdugo, Mauricio Moraga, Alexander J. Mentzer, Carlos D. Bustamante, Andrés Moreno-Estrada |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,261 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 291 | 13% |
| Chile | 123 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 75 | 3% |
| Mexico | 73 | 3% |
| Japan | 71 | 3% |
| Colombia | 67 | 3% |
| Argentina | 63 | 3% |
| Peru | 39 | 2% |
| Canada | 38 | 2% |
| Other | 320 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1101 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1754 | 78% |
| Scientists | 415 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 50 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 41 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 318 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 20% |
| Researcher | 51 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 19% |
| Unknown | 65 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 56 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 69 | 22% |
| Unknown | 78 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2765. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,605
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#264
of 98,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164
of 431,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#15
of 939 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 939 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.