You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology—Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): An Extension of the STROBE Statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS Medicine, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carl Lachat, Dana Hawwash, Marga C. Ocké, Christina Berg, Elisabet Forsum, Agneta Hörnell, Christel Larsson, Emily Sonestedt, Elisabet Wirfält, Agneta Åkesson, Patrick Kolsteren, Graham Byrnes, Willem De Keyzer, John Van Camp, Janet E. Cade, Nadia Slimani, Myriam Cevallos, Matthias Egger, Inge Huybrechts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 20% |
| Belgium | 6 | 12% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 54% |
| Scientists | 13 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 260 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 15% |
| Researcher | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 68 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 86 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#755,170
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#1,168
of 5,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,366
of 361,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#36
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.