| Title |
The effect of clinician-patient alliance and communication on treatment adherence in mental health care: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-12-87 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Thompson, Rose McCabe |
| Abstract |
Nonadherence to mental health treatment incurs clinical and economic burdens. The clinician-patient alliance, negotiated through clinical interaction, presents a critical intervention point. Recent medical reviews of communication and adherence behaviour exclude studies with psychiatric samples. The following examines the impact of clinician-patient alliance and communication on adherence in mental health, identifying the specific mechanisms that mobilise patient engagement. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Egypt | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 364 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 14% |
| Researcher | 50 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 8% |
| Other | 65 | 17% |
| Unknown | 67 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 21% |
| Psychology | 78 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 41 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 53 | 14% |
| Unknown | 82 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,653,352
of 24,116,965 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#552
of 5,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,814
of 167,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#5
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,116,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.