You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older residents in Irish nursing homes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Age & Ageing, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1093/ageing/afs068 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cristin Ryan, Denis O'Mahony, Julia Kennedy, Peter Weedle, Elmarie Cottrell, Marianne Heffernan, Brid O'Mahony, Stephen Byrne |
Abstract |
STOPP/START was formulated to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) in older people. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of PIP and PPO in older Irish patients in residential care using STOPP/START. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
Researcher | 12 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 20% |
Unknown | 9 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 47% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 13% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Age & Ageing
#3,380
of 3,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,761
of 178,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Age & Ageing
#35
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.