↓ Skip to main content

Development and preliminary evaluation of a psychosocial intervention for modifying psychosocial risk factors associated with foot re-ulceration in diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Behaviour Research & Therapy, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and preliminary evaluation of a psychosocial intervention for modifying psychosocial risk factors associated with foot re-ulceration in diabetes
Published in
Behaviour Research & Therapy, March 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2012.02.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Vedhara, A. Beattie, C. Metcalfe, S. Roche, J. Weinman, N. Cullum, P. Price, C. Dayan, A.R. Cooper, R. Campbell, T. Chalder

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers are a common, chronic and costly complication of Diabetes, with the greatest risk for ulceration being previous ulceration. Previous approaches to reducing re-ulceration risk have not, however, considered the psychosocial factors which may influence this risk. We reviewed the existing evidence in this area and developed a therapeutic model which informed the content, structure and format of a psychosocial intervention designed to modify the psychosocial risk factors associated with re-ulceration. The intervention was subjected to a qualitative evaluation in a feasibility study which involved a randomised controlled trial in which 10 individuals were randomised to receive the intervention and 5 individuals to usual care. Individuals in both arms participated in in-depth qualitative interviews after the first 10 weeks of the intervention and again after the final maintenance session. The intervention was perceived as acceptable and patients' reported evidence of sustained change in several of the psychosocial risks identified in the therapeutic model. These observations were supported in the descriptive findings obtained from questionnaires measuring mood, cognitions, behaviour and social support. The intervention appears to offer an acceptable and effective way of modifying the psychosocial risk factors associated with re-ulceration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 2 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Professor 9 6%
Other 40 28%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 24%
Psychology 31 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Unspecified 8 6%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,947,998
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#2,461
of 2,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,784
of 169,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#25
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.