You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health state utilities associated with caring for an individual with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Economics, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/13696998.2020.1793764 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate Williams, Adam Gibson, Linda McNamara, Trefor Jones, Andrew J. Lloyd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#14,488,906
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Economics
#727
of 1,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,595
of 398,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Economics
#10
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.