You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ultrasound investigation of sacral dimples and other stigmata of spinal dysraphism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Disease in Childhood, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303564 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew McGovern, Sarah Mulligan, Olivia Carney, Deirdre Wall, Edina Moylett |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 26% |
| Other | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 70% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,009,134
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood
#2,943
of 7,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,626
of 214,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood
#34
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.