Title |
Noninvasive ventilation after early extubation in patients recovering from hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a single-centre feasibility study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-012-2652-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rosanna Vaschetto, Emilia Turucz, Fabrizio Dellapiazza, Stefania Guido, Davide Colombo, Gianmaria Cammarota, Francesco Della Corte, Massimo Antonelli, Paolo Navalesi |
Abstract |
The use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) to facilitate discontinuation of mechanical ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (hypoxemic ARF) has never been explored. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility of early extubation followed by immediate NIV, compared conventional weaning, in patients with resolving hypoxemic ARF. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 131 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 15% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
Professor | 9 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
Other | 31 | 23% |
Unknown | 32 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 56% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 37 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,261,967
of 25,347,980 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,401
of 5,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,744
of 171,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#26
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,347,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.