↓ Skip to main content

Understanding molecular mechanisms in peritoneal dissemination of colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Virchows Archiv, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Understanding molecular mechanisms in peritoneal dissemination of colorectal cancer
Published in
Virchows Archiv, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00428-012-1287-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. M. V. de Cuba, R. Kwakman, M. van Egmond, L. J. W. Bosch, H. J. Bonjer, G. A. Meijer, E. A. te Velde

Abstract

When colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasizes, this is mostly to the liver via the portal circulation. In addition, 10-25 % of CRC patients eventually show metastases in the peritoneum. A selection of these patients is treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). However, several clinical needs still exist in which biomarkers could play an important role. Relatively little is known about the biology of peritoneal spread of CRC. The development of peritoneal metastases (PM) involves several steps, including: detachment of malignant cells; anoikis evasion; attachment to and invasion of the peritoneal surface ultimately ending in a colonization phase in which the malignant cells thrive in the newly formed niche. In this paper, we provide an overview of molecules associated with peritoneal dissemination and explore the clinical possibilities of these candidate biomarkers. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine and Medline to identify studies on the biological behaviour of PM of CRC. In a series of over 100 studies on PM published between 1990 and 2010, IGF-1, HIF1α, VEGF, EGFR and ITGB1 emerge as the most interesting candidates for possible clinical application. Even though these promising candidate biomarkers have been identified, all of these require extensive further validation prior to clinical application. Yet, the pace of the omics revolution makes that the question is not if, but when biomarkers will be introduced to improve diagnosis and ultimately outcome of patients with PM due to CRC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Ukraine 1 2%
France 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,161,674
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Virchows Archiv
#1,718
of 1,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,473
of 164,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virchows Archiv
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,934 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.