↓ Skip to main content

Forest responses to increasing aridity and warmth in the southwestern United States

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
422 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
552 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Forest responses to increasing aridity and warmth in the southwestern United States
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0914211107
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Park Williams, Craig D. Allen, Constance I. Millar, Thomas W. Swetnam, Joel Michaelsen, Christopher J. Still, Steven W. Leavitt

Abstract

In recent decades, intense droughts, insect outbreaks, and wildfires have led to decreasing tree growth and increasing mortality in many temperate forests. We compared annual tree-ring width data from 1,097 populations in the coterminous United States to climate data and evaluated site-specific tree responses to climate variations throughout the 20th century. For each population, we developed a climate-driven growth equation by using climate records to predict annual ring widths. Forests within the southwestern United States appear particularly sensitive to drought and warmth. We input 21st century climate projections to the equations to predict growth responses. Our results suggest that if temperature and aridity rise as they are projected to, southwestern trees will experience substantially reduced growth during this century. As tree growth declines, mortality rates may increase at many sites. Increases in wildfires and bark-beetle outbreaks in the most recent decade are likely related to extreme drought and high temperatures during this period. Using satellite imagery and aerial survey data, we conservatively calculate that ≈ 2.7% of southwestern forest and woodland area experienced substantial mortality due to wildfires from 1984 to 2006, and ≈ 7.6% experienced mortality associated with bark beetles from 1997 to 2008. We estimate that up to ≈ 18% of southwestern forest area (excluding woodlands) experienced mortality due to bark beetles or wildfire during this period. Expected climatic changes will alter future forest productivity, disturbance regimes, and species ranges throughout the Southwest. Emerging knowledge of these impending transitions informs efforts to adaptively manage southwestern forests.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 552 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 21 4%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 517 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 142 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 20%
Student > Master 79 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 5%
Other 26 5%
Other 82 15%
Unknown 83 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 180 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 83 15%
Engineering 13 2%
Social Sciences 8 1%
Other 30 5%
Unknown 109 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2019.
All research outputs
#615,612
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#10,623
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,574
of 190,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#38
of 712 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 712 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.