↓ Skip to main content

Mapping and correcting the influence of gaze position on pupil size measurements

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
Title
Mapping and correcting the influence of gaze position on pupil size measurements
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, May 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13428-015-0588-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taylor R. Hayes, Alexander A. Petrov

Abstract

Pupil size is correlated with a wide variety of important cognitive variables and is increasingly being used by cognitive scientists. Pupil data can be recorded inexpensively and non-invasively by many commonly used video-based eye-tracking cameras. Despite the relative ease of data collection and increasing prevalence of pupil data in the cognitive literature, researchers often underestimate the methodological challenges associated with controlling for confounds that can result in misinterpretation of their data. One serious confound that is often not properly controlled is pupil foreshortening error (PFE)-the foreshortening of the pupil image as the eye rotates away from the camera. Here we systematically map PFE using an artificial eye model and then apply a geometric model correction. Three artificial eyes with different fixed pupil sizes were used to systematically measure changes in pupil size as a function of gaze position with a desktop EyeLink 1000 tracker. A grid-based map of pupil measurements was recorded with each artificial eye across three experimental layouts of the eye-tracking camera and display. Large, systematic deviations in pupil size were observed across all nine maps. The measured PFE was corrected by a geometric model that expressed the foreshortening of the pupil area as a function of the cosine of the angle between the eye-to-camera axis and the eye-to-stimulus axis. The model reduced the root mean squared error of pupil measurements by 82.5 % when the model parameters were pre-set to the physical layout dimensions, and by 97.5 % when they were optimized to fit the empirical error surface.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 224 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 23%
Researcher 37 16%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 29%
Neuroscience 29 13%
Engineering 19 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 65 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,754,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#822
of 2,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,714
of 279,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.