↓ Skip to main content

Food Web Pathway Determines How Selenium Affects Aquatic Ecosystems: A San Francisco Bay Case Study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Food Web Pathway Determines How Selenium Affects Aquatic Ecosystems: A San Francisco Bay Case Study
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, August 2004
DOI 10.1021/es0499647
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Robin Stewart, Samuel N. Luoma, Christian E. Schlekat, Martina A. Doblin, Kathryn A. Hieb

Abstract

Chemical contaminants disrupt ecosystems, but specific effects may be under-appreciated when poorly known processes such as uptake mechanisms, uptake via diet, food preferences, and food web dynamics are influential. Here we show that a combination of food web structure and the physiology of trace element accumulation explain why some species in San Francisco Bay are threatened by a relatively low level of selenium contamination and some are not. Bivalves and crustacean zooplankton form the base of two dominant food webs in estuaries. The dominant bivalve Potamocorbula amurensis has a 10-fold slower rate constant of loss for selenium than do common crustaceans such as copepods and the mysid Neomysis mercedis (rate constant of loss, ke = 0.025, 0.155, and 0.25 d(-1), respectively). The result is much higher selenium concentrations in the bivalve than in the crustaceans. Stable isotope analyses show that this difference is propagated up the respective food webs in San Francisco Bay. Several predators of bivalves have tissue concentrations of selenium that exceed thresholds thought to be associated with teratogenesis or reproductive failure (liver Se >15 microg g(-1) dry weight). Deformities typical of selenium-induced teratogenesis were observed in one of these species. Concentrations of selenium in tissues of predators of zooplankton are less than the thresholds. Basic physiological and ecological processes can drive wide differences in exposure and effects among species, but such processes are rarely considered in traditional evaluations of contaminant impacts.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 123 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 21%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 43 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 9%
Chemistry 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 22 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#9,522
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,540
of 60,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#31
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.