You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-70 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shannon D Scott, Lauren Albrecht, Kathy O’Leary, Geoff DC Ball, Lisa Hartling, Anne Hofmeyer, C Allyson Jones, Terry P Klassen, Katharina Kovacs Burns, Amanda S Newton, David Thompson, Donna M Dryden |
| Abstract |
Knowledge translation (KT) aims to close the research-practice gap in order to realize and maximize the benefits of research within the practice setting. Previous studies have investigated KT strategies in nursing and medicine; however, the present study is the first systematic review of the effectiveness of a variety of KT interventions in five allied health disciplines: dietetics, occupational therapy, pharmacy, physiotherapy, and speech-language pathology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 19% |
| Canada | 4 | 15% |
| Australia | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 54% |
| Scientists | 6 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 10 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Chile | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 439 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 80 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 15% |
| Researcher | 61 | 13% |
| Other | 30 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 119 | 25% |
| Unknown | 83 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 84 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 55 | 12% |
| Psychology | 44 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 77 | 16% |
| Unknown | 101 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,638,906
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#356
of 1,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,449
of 164,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.