You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Age at Last Birth in Relation to Risk of Endometrial Cancer: Pooled Analysis in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Epidemiology, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aje/kws129 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Veronica Wendy Setiawan, Malcolm C. Pike, Stalo Karageorgi, Sandra L. Deming, Kristin Anderson, Leslie Bernstein, Louise A. Brinton, Hui Cai, James R. Cerhan, Wendy Cozen, Chu Chen, Jennifer Doherty, Jo L. Freudenheim, Marc T. Goodman, Susan E. Hankinson, James V. Lacey, Xiaolin Liang, Jolanta Lissowska, Lingeng Lu, Galina Lurie, Thomas Mack, Rayna K. Matsuno, Susan McCann, Kirsten B. Moysich, Sara H. Olson, Radhai Rastogi, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Harvey Risch, Kim Robien, Catherine Schairer, Xiao-Ou Shu, Amanda B. Spurdle, Brian L. Strom, Pamela J. Thompson, Giske Ursin, Penelope M. Webb, Noel S. Weiss, Nicolas Wentzensen, Yong-Bing Xiang, Hannah P. Yang, Herbert Yu, Pamela L. Horn-Ross, Immaculata De Vivo, the Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Japan | 2 | 15% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 49% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,633,460
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Epidemiology
#1,092
of 9,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,397
of 181,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Epidemiology
#10
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.