| Title |
Could We Have Known? A Qualitative Analysis of Data from Women Who Survived an Attempted Homicide by an Intimate Partner
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21202.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina Nicolaidis, Mary Ann Curry, Yvonne Ulrich, Phyllis Sharps, Judith McFarlane, Doris Campbell, Faye Gary, Kathryn Laughon, Nancy Glass, Jacquelyn Campbell |
| Abstract |
To examine in-depth the lives of women whose partners attempted to kill them, and to identify patterns that may aid in the clinician's ability to predict, prevent, or counsel about femicide or attempted femicide. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 718 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 31 | 4% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 19 | 3% |
| United States | 10 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 648 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 715 | 100% |
| Scientists | 2 | <1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 24% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 178. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2022.
All research outputs
#230,459
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#198
of 8,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179
of 56,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.