You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Aspiration pneumonitis in an overdose population: Frequency, predictors, and outcomes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care Medicine, January 2004
|
DOI | 10.1097/01.ccm.0000104207.42729.e4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Geoffrey K. Isbister, Fiona Downes, David Sibbritt, Andrew H. Dawson, Ian M. Whyte |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
Other | 24 | 32% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 66% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,318,925
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#1,614
of 9,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,039
of 143,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#5
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.