You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ancestors of domestic cats in Neolithic Central Europe: Isotopic evidence of a synanthropic diet
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1918884117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magdalena Krajcarz, Maciej T. Krajcarz, Mateusz Baca, Chris Baumann, Wim Van Neer, Danijela Popović, Magdalena Sudoł-Procyk, Bartosz Wach, Jarosław Wilczyński, Michał Wojenka, Hervé Bocherens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 248 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 6% |
| Japan | 16 | 6% |
| Germany | 11 | 4% |
| France | 8 | 3% |
| Spain | 6 | 2% |
| Poland | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 122 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 202 | 81% |
| Scientists | 35 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 28% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 415. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#71,761
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,730
of 103,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,613
of 431,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#65
of 1,129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.