You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spatial proximity moderates genotype uncertainty in genetic tagging studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2000247117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ben C. Augustine, J. Andrew Royle, Daniel W. Linden, Angela K. Fuller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 40% |
| Canada | 5 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 48% |
| Scientists | 24 | 48% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 39% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 22% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,389,611
of 25,623,883 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#19,292
of 103,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,247
of 431,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#536
of 1,129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,623,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.