Title |
Inorganic C-sources for Lemanea, Cladophora and Ranunculus in a fast-flowing stream: Measurements of gas exchange and of carbon isotope ratio and their ecological implications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Oecologia, April 1982
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00377138 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John Raven, John Beardall, Howard Griffiths |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 7 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
Researcher | 4 | 16% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 44% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 32% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,718,319
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#971
of 4,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#842
of 7,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.