You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The pseudo-caspase FLIP(L) regulates cell fate following p53 activation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2001520117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Lees, Alexander J McIntyre, Nyree T Crawford, Fiammetta Falcone, Christopher McCann, Caitriona Holohan, Gerard P Quinn, Jamie Z Roberts, Tamas Sessler, Peter F Gallagher, Gemma M A Gregg, Katherine McAllister, Kirsty M McLaughlin, Wendy L Allen, Laurence J Egan, Aideen E Ryan, Melissa J Labonte-Wilson, Philip D Dunne, Mark Wappett, Vicky M Coyle, Patrick G Johnston, Emma M Kerr, Daniel B Longley, Simon S McDade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 40% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Austria | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,471,732
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#35,740
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,815
of 401,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#747
of 1,130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.