↓ Skip to main content

Ideal multipole ion traps from planar ring electrodes

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Physics B, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Ideal multipole ion traps from planar ring electrodes
Published in
Applied Physics B, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00340-013-5451-0
Authors

Robert J. Clark

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 9 45%
Engineering 4 20%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2012.
All research outputs
#21,697,638
of 24,214,995 outputs
Outputs from Applied Physics B
#1,497
of 1,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,406
of 197,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Physics B
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,214,995 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,582 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.