| Title |
Concomitant Mitral Regurgitation in Patients With Chronic Aortic Regurgitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li-Tan Yang, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, Christopher G. Scott, Ratnasari Padang, Joseph F. Maalouf, Patricia A. Pellikka, Hector I. Michelena |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 5 | 9% |
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| Colombia | 3 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Scientists | 6 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 50% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,042,032
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,581
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,792
of 432,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#78
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.