↓ Skip to main content

Effects of oral rehydration therapy on gastric volume and pH in patients with preanesthetic H2 antagonist

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anesthesia, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Effects of oral rehydration therapy on gastric volume and pH in patients with preanesthetic H2 antagonist
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00540-012-1449-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kishiko Nakai, Hidetomo Niwa, Masatou Kitayama, Yutaka Satoh, Kazuyoshi Hirota

Abstract

Recent preanesthetic fasting practice allows patients to take clear fluids up to 2 h before surgery without taking any antacid for the prophylaxis of aspiration pneumonia; this practice is defined as oral rehydration therapy (ORT). It has been reported that with ORT the gastric volume may be significantly lower than that with a standard fasting regimen, although in a standard fasting regimen without preanesthetic antacid, gastric pH and volume values could be critical for causing aspiration pneumonia. In this study we compared gastric fluid status in patients with ORT and those with a standard fasting regimen; patients in both groups received a preanesthetic H(2) antagonist. One hundred and four patients were randomly assigned to either the ORT or standard fasting group, and all were given roxatidine 75 mg 2 h before surgery. After the induction of anesthesia, the gastric contents were collected via a gastric tube to measure gastric volume and pH. Neither gastric volume nor pH differed between the groups (ORT 9.6 ± 8.2 ml and 5.6 ± 1.7, respectively, vs. standard fasting 8.5 ± 6.8 ml and 5.5 ± 1.7, respectively). These data suggest that ORT may not reduce gastric volume in patients receiving a preanesthetic H(2) antagonist.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 45%
Unspecified 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%