↓ Skip to main content

Syndrome Specificity and Mother–Child Interactions: Examining Positive and Negative Parenting Across Contexts and Time

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
Title
Syndrome Specificity and Mother–Child Interactions: Examining Positive and Negative Parenting Across Contexts and Time
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1605-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Blacher, Bruce L. Baker, Araksia Kaladjian

Abstract

This study examined the extent to which child syndromes and observation context related to mothers' parenting behaviors. Longitudinal observations were conducted of parenting behavior across ages 3, 4, and 5 years during structured and unstructured activities. The 183 participants included mothers of children with autism spectrum disorders, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, undifferentiated developmental delay, or typical cognitive development. Negative parenting behaviors were higher in structured activities and higher in mothers of children in all developmentally delayed groups. Positive parenting was higher in unstructured activities and especially high for mothers of children with Down syndrome. Despite differences found through direct observation of parenting children in different diagnostic groups, they are not as strong as syndrome-group differences found through more commonly used self-report questionnaires assessing domains like parenting stress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 234 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 20%
Student > Master 42 18%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 58 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 89 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 8%
Social Sciences 19 8%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 70 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2012.
All research outputs
#19,400,321
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#4,464
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,388
of 166,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#52
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.