You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Synthesis of the Biology and Ecology of Sculpin Species in the Laurentian Great Lakes and Implications for the Adaptive Capacity of the Benthic Ecosystem
|
---|---|
Published in |
Reviews in Fisheries Science, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1080/23308249.2020.1782341 |
Authors |
Kelly F. Robinson, Charles R. Bronte, David B. Bunnell, Peter T. Euclide, Darryl W. Hondorp, John A. Janssen, Matthew S. Kornis, Derek H. Ogle, Will Otte, Stephen C. Riley, Mark R. Vinson, Shea L. Volkel, Brian C. Weidel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 67% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 7 | 58% |
Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 32% |
Student > Master | 5 | 23% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 27% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 18% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,592,176
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fisheries Science
#76
of 242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,636
of 429,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fisheries Science
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.