↓ Skip to main content

Using Social Networks to Reach Black MSM for HIV Testing and Linkage to Care

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Using Social Networks to Reach Black MSM for HIV Testing and Linkage to Care
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10461-011-9918-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent Fuqua, Yea-Hung Chen, Tracey Packer, Teri Dowling, Theresa O. Ick, Binh Nguyen, Grant N. Colfax, H. Fisher Raymond

Abstract

Black men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV infection. Black MSM in San Francisco may have higher rates of unrecognized HIV infections. Increased HIV testing among Black MSM may reduce the numbers of unrecognized infections, inform more men of their status and thus reduce the potential for ongoing transmissions. Social network HIV testing programs have focused on asking HIV-positive and/or high-risk negative men to recruit their social or sexual contacts. We used a network approach to deliver HIV testing to Black MSM in San Francisco and collected risk assessment data. Participants were asked to recruit any of their social contacts who were also Black MSM. Recruitment by risk level and HIV status was heterogeneous. HIV infection among this population is associated with older age, having a high school education or higher and currently being homeless. Fully 23% of HIV positive Black MSM are unaware of their infection. Only a third of unrecognized infections were recruited by a known HIV-positive participant. Linkage to care was a challenge and underscores the need for comprehensive systems and support to link Black MSM to care and treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 20%
Social Sciences 29 18%
Psychology 25 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 37 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2012.
All research outputs
#13,718,294
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,777
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,535
of 110,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.