| Title |
Economic evaluation of structural and non-structural flood risk management measures: examples from the Mulde River
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-011-9997-z |
| Authors |
Volker Meyer, Sally Priest, Christian Kuhlicke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 34 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 38 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,649,668
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#317
of 1,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,444
of 136,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.