| Title |
In search of materials for artificial flagella of nanoswimmers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-012-6734-2 |
| Authors |
Rwitajit Majumdar, Neha Singh, J. S. Rathore, N. N. Sharma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 27% |
| Researcher | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 9 | 41% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 14% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 9% |
| Energy | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,161,674
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#4,467
of 4,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,473
of 164,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#32
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,607 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.