| Title |
Reorganisation of primary care for older adults during COVID-19: a cross-sectional database study in the UK
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x710933 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Joy, Dylan McGagh, Nicholas Jones, Harshana Liyanage, Julian Sherlock, Vaishnavi Parimalanathan, Oluwafunmi Akinyemi, Jeremy van Vlymen, Gary Howsam, Martin Marshall, FD Richard Hobbs, Simon de Lusignan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 227 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 79 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 19% |
| Unknown | 86 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,891,021
of 25,216,325 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#920
of 4,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,253
of 403,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#21
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,216,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.