↓ Skip to main content

Feeling the past: The absence of experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on text processing

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Feeling the past: The absence of experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on text processing
Published in
Memory & Cognition, July 2012
DOI 10.3758/s13421-012-0232-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J. Traxler, Donald J. Foss, Ruchira Podali, Megan Zirnstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Colombia 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 33%
Student > Master 4 15%
Researcher 3 11%
Professor 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 41%
Linguistics 5 19%
Neuroscience 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Philosophy 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,509,092
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#756
of 1,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,089
of 178,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.