| Title |
How to Write a Peer Review for a Clinical Case
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Case Reports, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.06.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Grapsa, Edgar Argulian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 14% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 65% |
| Scientists | 12 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2020.
All research outputs
#997,031
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Case Reports
#92
of 1,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,012
of 430,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Case Reports
#4
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.