↓ Skip to main content

Structured clinical assessment of the ear, nose and throat in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s)

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Structured clinical assessment of the ear, nose and throat in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s)
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00405-012-2110-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcos Martinez Del Pero, Niels Rasmussen, Afzal Chaudhry, Piyush Jani, David Jayne

Abstract

The objective of this prospective cross-sectional study is to describe the clinical otorhinolaryngological manifestations of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) (GPA) in a prospective cohort. All patients suffering from GPA seen in a tertiary centre between March 2007 and November 2008 had a detailed clinical assessment by an ENT surgeon of their ear, nose and head and neck complaints. An evaluation of whether there was disease activity and/or infection in each ENT area was made using the European Vasculitis Study Group guidelines. The number of patients assessed was 144. The proportion of female patients was 47 % (n = 69) and the median age was 57.7 years (IQ range 42.5-68.5). The prevalence of ENT involvement was 87 % (125/144). Hearing loss and abnormal tympanic membrane appearance were more common in patients with active disease and no infection (7/8 and 6/8, respectively, in active disease cf. 59/131 and 52/131, respectively, in remission). Nasal crusting was the most common nasal complaint recorded (52/144, 36 %) and bloody rhinorrhoea was the most common symptom in patients with disease activity. Rhinoscopy was highly sensitive in diagnosing disease activity (100 %). Subglottic stenosis was the most common head and neck manifestation (27/121, 22 %) and 74 % were symptomatic. In conclusion, the pattern and frequency of clinical ENT manifestations in GPA have been described in a large patient cohort. The use of tools readily available in the ENT clinic was essential to assess these patients accurately. This dataset will form the basis of an objective scoring system to measure disease activity in the ENT system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2012.
All research outputs
#18,310,549
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#1,624
of 3,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,710
of 163,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#28
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,036 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.