| Title |
Applying the precautionary principle to personal protective equipment (PPE) guidance during the COVID-19 pandemic: did we learn the lessons of SARS?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-020-01760-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren Crosby, Edward Crosby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 17 | 30% |
| Australia | 6 | 11% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
| Armenia | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 60% |
| Scientists | 10 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#391,678
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#19
of 2,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,213
of 430,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.