| Title |
The John Insall Award: No Benefit of Minimally Invasive TKA on Gait and Strength Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2486-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julien Wegrzyn, Sebastien Parratte, Krista ColemanWood, Kenton R. Kaufman, Mark W. Pagnano |
| Abstract |
While some clinical reports suggest minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques improve recovery and reduce pain in the first months after TKA, it is unclear whether it improves gait and thigh muscle strength. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 58 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 64 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,187,031
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,302
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,955
of 289,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#39
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.