Title |
Health Canada e-cigarette response delayed
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.109-5122 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lauren Vogel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 13% |
Librarian | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 19% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 5 | 31% |
Psychology | 3 | 19% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,869,980
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#3,588
of 8,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,898
of 264,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#48
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.