↓ Skip to main content

Researching Reflexivity: Negotiating Identity and Ambiguity in a Cross-Cultural Research Project

Overview of attention for article published in Field Methods, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Researching Reflexivity: Negotiating Identity and Ambiguity in a Cross-Cultural Research Project
Published in
Field Methods, September 2010
DOI 10.1177/1525822x10380869
Authors

Peter S. Hill, Vanessa Lee, Megan Jennaway

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 62 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 35%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 32 48%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 11%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2012.
All research outputs
#13,541,585
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Field Methods
#153
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,619
of 95,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Field Methods
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.